Second choice from the programs I have used is Capture One Pro, which if it were not for NX2 it would be my favourite workflow. As I have a Nikon camera, I do find that the results seem to be more pleasing and very accurate renditions as opposed to some other programs in terms of finished product, probably because it is designed around the Nikon camera system in particular. NX2 being slightly more intuitive and fixes some glitches that were apparent in NX. Equally not all encompass Raw converters, which for me is crucial.įor workflow together with its very useful control points for adjustments, I have used NX and now NX2.
#Nikon capture nx2 lasso tool pro#
Oh and further deviance - I use a mac (MacBook pro 2.4 GH 15") and use one or two progs that are mac only.įirstly, I would say that some programs are pure workflow whilst others do a lot more in terms of image editing and this needs to be born in mind. My images are at /crisscross all D80 are processed in NX, the older ones I am gradually re-editing, so 'recent' galleries use mostly re-edits.
#Nikon capture nx2 lasso tool full#
nef keeps a record of the operations, not the full content of each 'step' or layer except in a temporary cache. psd, but with files a fraction of the size. nef which then keeps all the working 'live' like. nef images I find I can do far better edits of previous camera output including Panasonic FZ7 and Canon 350D, the latter after doing as neutral as possible conversion from. Is there anyone else out there who also uses it and would value a discussion of its finer points? I never got on with Photoshop (elements) and nearly always use Nikon Capture, which is very intuitive and avoids the struggle to fully control layers.
0 kommentar(er)
